Trust Development
Start a project

Warsaw Spire, Plac Europejski 1, floor 22
00-844 Warszawa, Poland

hello@trust-development.com

EST. 2014 Warsaw · Tallinn

Software that
has to work.

Trust Development is a 62-person engineering studio. We take responsibility for systems where downtime is measured in money — payments, logistics, patient records.

The Trust Development engineering floor in Warsaw
Fig. 01 — Engineering floor, Warsaw Spire 52.2327° N, 20.9840° E
11Years in operation
62Engineers on staff
148Systems delivered
96%Client retention

01 Capabilities

Six things we do, and nothing we don't.

We are deliberately narrow. Every engagement is staffed by people who have shipped the same class of system before — not by whoever happened to be on the bench.

01

Custom platform engineering

Back-end systems designed around your domain, not around a framework tutorial. Event-driven services, transactional cores, integration layers, migration off legacy monoliths.

02

Web applications

Operator consoles, customer portals and dashboards built for people who use them eight hours a day. Accessible, keyboard-complete, fast on a mid-range laptop.

03

Mobile applications

Native and cross-platform apps for iOS and Android, including offline-first field tooling, background sync, and store release management under your developer account.

04

Cloud & reliability

Infrastructure as code, CI/CD, observability and on-call practice. We define the SLOs with you first, then build the system that can meet them.

05

Data engineering

Warehouses, pipelines and reporting layers. Clean contracts between operational and analytical systems so finance and product stop arguing about whose number is right.

06

Security & compliance

Threat modelling, secure SDLC, penetration test remediation, and the evidence trail auditors ask for under GDPR, PCI DSS and ISO 27001.

Full capability breakdown →

02 Method

Five phases. No surprises in month four.

Every project runs the same route. You always know which phase you are in, what it costs, and what has to be true before the next one starts.

  1. 01

    Discovery & scoping

    Two to four weeks. We interview your operators, read the existing code, and produce a written scope with a fixed price band. If the honest answer is "don't build this", you get that answer before you have spent a development budget.

  2. 02

    Architecture

    Domain model, service boundaries, data ownership, failure modes. Delivered as a decision record you keep — including the options we rejected and why.

  3. 03

    Build

    Two-week iterations against a public board. Working software in your staging environment from iteration one. Weekly demo, weekly written status, no invoice for work you have not seen running.

  4. 04

    Hardening

    Load testing, failure injection, security review, runbooks and dashboards. We rehearse the incidents before production does.

  5. 05

    Operate or hand over

    We either run it under an SLA with named on-call engineers, or we spend six weeks transferring it to your team with documentation and paired work. Both are fine. Being irreplaceable is not our business model.

03 Selected work

Systems currently in production.

A sample of engagements our clients have allowed us to describe. Names of private companies are withheld where the contract requires it.

04 Stack

Boring technology, chosen on purpose.

We pick tools with long support windows and a hiring market, so your system stays maintainable after we leave the room.

TypeScript
Go
Python
React
Node.js
PostgreSQL
Kubernetes
Terraform
Kafka
Redis
AWS
Grafana

05 References

What our clients put in writing.

Quotes published with permission. Full reference calls are available on request during procurement.

“They were the only vendor in the tender who told us our original scope was wrong. It cost them the bigger contract and won them a five-year relationship.”

Marta Wiśniewska COO · Payments group, Warsaw

“Two weeks after go-live we had an incident at 03:00. Their on-call engineer was in our channel before our own monitoring paged us.”

Kristjan Tamm CTO · Logistics operator, Tallinn

“The handover documentation was better than the documentation for systems our own team wrote. We have not needed to call them since — which was the point.”

Dr. Anke Reinhardt Head of IT · Clinic network, Munich

06 Next step

Tell us what is breaking.

Send a short description of the problem. A senior engineer — not a salesperson — replies within one working day with either a plan, a question, or an honest "this isn't for us".